Design Efficiency (D, A, G)

Evaluates the quality of an experimental design using three criteria: D-efficiency (determinant), A-efficiency (trace), and G-efficiency (leverage).

Statusvalidated
Version1.0.0
Minitab equivalentStat > DOE > Factorial > Analyze Factorial Design > Design Diagnostics

Description

Design efficiency evaluates how well an experimental design estimates model parameters, relative to a theoretically optimal orthogonal design. A value of 100% means perfect orthogonality. **D-efficiency** is based on the determinant of the information matrix X'X. It minimizes the volume of the confidence ellipsoid of the parameter estimates — i.e., all parameters are estimated as precisely as possible simultaneously. **A-efficiency** is based on the trace of the inverse information matrix. It minimizes the average variance of parameter estimates — i.e., parameters are estimated as accurately as possible on average. **G-efficiency** is based on the maximum leverage value (diagonal of the hat matrix). It minimizes the maximum prediction variance — i.e., no single design point dominates the estimation disproportionately.

Formulas

D_eff
p = number of model terms (incl. intercept), n = number of runs. Normalizes the p-th root of the determinant by the number of runs.
A_eff
Based on the trace of the inverse information matrix. Minimizes the average variance of parameter estimates.
G_eff
h_ii = diag(H) are the leverage values of the hat matrix H = X(X'X)⁻¹X'. Minimizes the maximum prediction variance.
H
The leverage values h_ii on the diagonal measure the influence of each design point on the estimates.
X
Contains intercept, coded main effects, and 2-factor interactions.

Assumptions

  • Coded design matrix with values in {−1, 0, +1}
  • Linear model with main effects and 2-factor interactions
  • X'X must be invertible (non-singular design)

Limitations

  • Only considers main effects and 2-factor interactions in the model, no higher orders
  • Condition number is a simplified approximation (diagonal ratio instead of eigenvalues)

References

  • Atkinson, A.C. & Donev, A.N., Optimum Experimental Designs, Oxford, 1992 — Chapter 10
  • Montgomery, D.C., Design and Analysis of Experiments, 10th Ed., Wiley — Chapter 11
  • Myers, R.H. & Montgomery, D.C., Response Surface Methodology, 4th Ed., Wiley — Chapter 7